Kerry Won
|
by Greg Palast
November 04, 2004
Bush won Ohio by 136,483 votes. Typically in the United States,
about 3 percent of votes cast are voided-known as "spoilage" in
election jargon-because the ballots cast are inconclusive. Grag
Palast's investigation suggests that if Ohio's discarded ballots
were counted, Kerry would have won the state. Today the Cleveland
Plain Dealer reports there are a total of 247,672 votes not counted
in Ohio, if you add the 92,672 discarded votes plus the 155,000
provisional ballots.
Kerry won. Here's the facts.
I know you don't want to hear it. You can't face one more hung
chad. But I don't have a choice. As a journalist examining that
messy sausage called American democracy, it's my job to tell you
who got the most votes in the deciding states. Tuesday, in Ohio
and New Mexico, it was John Kerry.
Most voters in Ohio thought they were voting for Kerry. CNN's
exit poll showed Kerry beating Bush among Ohio women by 53 percent
to 47 percent. Kerry also defeated Bush among Ohio's male voters
51 percent to 49 percent. Unless a third gender voted in Ohio,
Kerry took the state.
So what's going on here? Answer: the exit polls are accurate.
Pollsters ask, "Who did you vote for?" Unfortunately, they don't
ask the crucial, question, "Was your vote counted?" The voters
don't know.
Here's why. Although the exit polls show that most voters in Ohio
punched cards for Kerry-Edwards, thousands of these votes were
simply not recorded. This was predictable and it was predicted.
See here
Once again, at the heart of the Ohio uncounted vote game are,
I'm sorry to report, hanging chads and pregnant chads, plus some
other ballot tricks old and new.
The election in Ohio was not decided by the voters but by something
called "spoilage." Typically in the United States, about 3 percent
of the vote is voided, just thrown away, not recorded. When the
bobble-head boobs on the tube tell you Ohio or any state was won
by 51 percent to 49 percent, don't you believe it ... it has never
happened in the United States, because the total never reaches
a neat 100 percent. The television totals simply subtract out
the spoiled vote.
And not all vote spoil equally. Most of those votes, say every
official report, come from African American and minority precincts.
see here
We saw this in Florida in 2000. Exit polls showed Gore with a
plurality of at least 50,000, but it didn't match the official
count. That's because the official, Secretary of State Katherine
Harris, excluded 179,855 spoiled votes. In Florida, as in Ohio,
most of these votes lost were cast on punch cards where the hole
wasn't punched through completely-leaving a 'hanging chad,' -or
was punched extra times. Whose cards were discarded? Expert statisticians
investigating spoilage for the government calculated that 54 percent
of the ballots thrown in the dumpster were cast by black folks.
(To read the report from the U.S. Civil Rights Commission, go
here
And here's the key: Florida is terribly typical. The majority
of ballots thrown out (there will be nearly 2 million tossed out
from Tuesday's election) will have been cast by African American
and other minority citizens.
So here we go again. Or, here we don't go again. Because unlike
last time, Democrats aren't even asking Ohio to count these cards
with the not-quite-punched holes (called "undervotes" in the voting
biz).
Ohio is one of the last states in America to still use the vote-spoiling
punch-card machines. And the Secretary of State of Ohio, J. Kenneth
Blackwell, wrote before the election, "the possibility of a close
election with punch cards as the state's primary voting device
invites a Florida-like calamity."
But this week, Blackwell, a rabidly partisan Republican, has warmed
up to the result of sticking with machines that have a habit of
eating Democratic votes. When asked if he feared being this year's
Katherine Harris, Blackwell noted that Ms. Fix-it's efforts landed
her a seat in Congress.
Exactly how many votes were lost to spoilage this time? Blackwell's
office, notably, won't say, though the law requires it be reported.
Hmm. But we know that last time, the total of Ohio votes discarded
reached a democracy-damaging 1.96 percent. The machines produced
their typical loss-that's 110,000 votes-overwhelmingly Democratic.
The Impact Of Challenges
First and foremost, Kerry was had by chads. But the Democrat wasn't
punched out by punch cards alone. There were also the 'challenges.'
That's a polite word for the Republican Party of Ohio's use of
an old Ku Klux Klan technique: the attempt to block thousands
of voters of color at the polls.
In Ohio, Wisconsin and Florida, the GOP laid plans for poll workers
to ambush citizens under arcane laws-almost never used-allowing
party-designated poll watchers to finger individual voters and
demand they be denied a ballot. The Ohio courts were horrified
and federal law prohibits targeting of voters where race is a
factor in the challenge. But our Supreme Court was prepared to
let Republicans stand in the voting booth door.
In the end, the challenges were not overwhelming, but they were
there. Many apparently resulted in voters getting these funky
"provisional" ballots-a kind of voting placebo-which may or may
not be counted. Blackwell estimates there were 175,000; Democrats
say 250,000. Pick your number. But as challenges were aimed at
minorities, no one doubts these are, again, overwhelmingly Democratic.
Count them up, add in the spoiled punch cards (easy to tally with
the human eye in a recount), and the totals begin to match the
exit polls; and, golly, you've got yourself a new president. Remember,
Bush won by 136,483 votes in Ohio.
Enchanted State's Enchanted Vote
Now, on to New Mexico, where a Kerry plurality-if all votes are
counted-is more obvious still. Before the election, in TomPaine.com,
I wrote, "John Kerry is down by several thousand votes in New
Mexico, though not one ballot has yet been counted."
How did that happen? It's the spoilage, stupid; and the provisional
ballots.
CNN said George Bush took New Mexico by 11,620 votes. Again, the
network total added up to that miraculous, and non-existent, '100
percent' of ballots cast.
New Mexico reported in the last race a spoilage rate of 2.68 percent,
votes lost almost entirely in Hispanic, Native American and poor
precincts-Democratic turf. From Tuesday's vote, assuming the same
ballot-loss rate, we can expect to see 18,000 ballots in the spoilage
bin.
Spoilage has a very Democratic look in New Mexico. Hispanic voters
in the Enchanted State, who voted more than two to one for Kerry,
are five times as likely to have their vote spoil as a white voter.
Counting these uncounted votes would easily overtake the Bush
'plurality.'
Already, the election-bending effects of spoilage are popping
up in the election stats, exactly where we'd expect them: in heavily
Hispanic areas controlled by Republican elections officials. Chaves
County, in the "Little Texas" area of New Mexico, has a 44 percent
Hispanic population, plus African Americans and Native Americans,
yet George Bush "won" there 68 percent to 31 percent.
I spoke with Chaves' Republican county clerk before the election,
and he told me that this huge spoilage rate among Hispanics simply
indicated that such people simply can't make up their minds on
the choice of candidate for president. Oddly, these brown people
drive across the desert to register their indecision in a voting
booth.
Now, let's add in the effect on the New Mexico tally of provisional
ballots.
"They were handing them out like candy," Albuquerque journalist
Renee Blake reported of provisional ballots. About 20,000 were
given out. Who got them?
Santiago Juarez who ran the "Faithful Citizenship" program for
the Catholic Archdiocese in New Mexico, told me that "his" voters,
poor Hispanics, whom he identified as solid Kerry supporters,
were handed the iffy provisional ballots. Hispanics were given
provisional ballots, rather than the countable kind "almost religiously,"
he said, at polling stations when there was the least question
about a voter's identification. Some voters, Santiago said, were
simply turned away.
Your Kerry Victory Party
So we can call Ohio and New Mexico for John Kerry-if we count
all the votes.
But that won't happen. Despite the Democratic Party's pledge,
the leadership this time gave in to racial disenfranchisement
once again. Why? No doubt, the Democrats know darn well that counting
all the spoiled and provisional ballots will require the cooperation
of Ohio's Secretary of State, Blackwell. He will ultimately decide
which spoiled and provisional ballots get tallied. Blackwell,
hankering to step into Kate Harris' political pumps, is unlikely
to permit anything close to a full count. Also, Democratic leadership
knows darn well the media would punish the party for demanding
a full count.
What now? Kerry won, so hold your victory party. But make sure
the shades are down: it may be become illegal to demand a full
vote count under PATRIOT Act III.
I used to write a column for the Guardian papers in London. Several
friends have asked me if I will again leave the country. In light
of the failure-a second time-to count all the votes, that won't
be necessary. My country has left me.
Greg Palast, contributing editor
to Harper's magazine, investigated the manipulation of the vote
for BBC Television's Newsnight. The documentary, "Bush Family
Fortunes," based on his New York Times bestseller, The Best Democracy
Money Can Buy, has been released this month on DVD .This article
first appeared at http://www.tompaine.com/articles/kerry_won.php
We are publishing it too because we think its essential
that as near to the entire world population as possible read it.
We think it should be published everywhere.
|
|
SPECTREZINE
Homepage
Weblog
Spectremail
Contact
LATEST
FEATURES
the
practical internationalism of the Dutch Socialist Party - by Ronald van
Raak
The
Left in Italy - by Paolo Gerbaudo
Europe
and the Lisbon Treaty - by Susan George
The
Last War of the 20th Century - Part Thirteen - by Jan Marijnissen and
Karel Glastra van Loon
LATEST
NEWS FROM
THE WEBLOG
Weblog-
Homepage
The Saintes Appeal
for a Nuclear-free Europe
Italian Left Euro-MPs:
Exploitation of fear for political purposes unacceptable
Turbulent times for Eurozone
CATEGORIES
Africa
Book Reviews
Corporate Crime
Current Issues
Economy and Society
East Asia
Editorial
Environment
Europe
Global Resistance
Latin America/Caribbean
Middle East
North America
Progressive Press
War
ARCHIVES
News
Review 2001-04
Features
2001
Features 2002
Features 2003-04
|