November 19, 2008 9:54 | By
Tony Iltis
Despite Western media and politicians having largely ignored a decade
of genocidal warfare that has cost 6 million lives, the recent upsurge
in fighting in the east of the Democratic Republic of the Congo
(DRC) has drawn not only media attention, but visits to the region
by the British and French foreign ministers and United Nations Secretary-General
Ban Ki-Moon.
The current round of fighting in North Kivu province, which began
on October 26 with an offensive by the Rwandan-backed rebel forces
of General Laurent Nkunda, is indeed a humanitarian catastrophe
- 200,000 people have been displaced, many not for the first time.
Refugee camps have been burned. There has been widespread looting,
rape and murder by both government troops and Nkunda's rebels, as
well as by other militias involved in the fighting.
United Nations "peacekeeping" forces, who have been deployed
in the eastern DRC since 2000, have warned that they will engage
the rebels if they attempt to take the provincial capital, Goma.
However, on October 27, civilians attacked the UN's Goma compound,
accusing the UN troops of failing to protect them from the fighting.
On October 29, Nkunda declared a unilateral ceasefire, denying
any intention of taking Goma. However, retreating government troops
indulged in a two-day violent rampage through the city.
On November 6, Nkunda carried out a brutal crackdown against the
town of Kiwanja after it was briefly taken from his rebels by local
militias currently in alliance with the government.
European politicians have begun echoing media calls for a Western
military intervention on humanitarian grounds.
However, this ignores that the UN presence since 2000 has been
worse than ineffective - there have been several scandals concerning
UN soldiers' involvement in sexual exploitation, including trading
food-aid for sex with minors.
Colonial legacy
Furthermore, these calls are based on a simplistic interpretation
of the violence as ethnic or tribal conflict.
In fact, this brutal multi-sided conflict, involving shifting alliances
between a bewildering array of armed factions as well as both government
and opposition forces from seven neighbouring countries, is the
product of continual Western intervention since the 1880s.
The current boundaries of the DRC were arbitrarily created at the
1885 Berlin Congress, at which the European imperialist powers literally
carved up Africa.
This congress gave the "Congo Free State" to Belgium's
King Leopold as a private commercial enterprise.
The wholesale enslavement of the population to produce rubber and
ivory left millions of Congolese dead, but made the Belgian royal
dynasty's fortune.
In 1960, Patrice Lumumba led the DRC to independence with the promise
that the era of exploitation by Western powers was over.
However, Belgium and the US colluded in his overthrow and murder
and established the brutal dictator Mobutu Sese Seko in power.
Resistance by pro-Lumumba forces continued, but by the time Latin
American revolutionary Che Guevara led a small Cuban military mission
to them in 1965, they were little more than remnants.
Guevara withdrew the Cubans after concluding that the remnants'
leader, Laurent-Desire Kabila, was more interested in timber and
ivory smuggling than waging a liberation struggle.
Mobutu renamed the country Zaire and set about making his fortune,
in part through plundering his country's mineral resources and pocketing
World Bank and International Monetary Fund loans, but also through
acting as a conduit for US covert wars and insurgencies against
a number of neighbouring countries.
The most significant of these was in Angola, where the US supported
an invasion by South Africa in an attempt to stop the coming to
power of the progressive MPLA after liberation from Portugal in
1975.
When this was thwarted by the intervention of Cuban internationalist
volunteers, Zaire became the base for the brutal CIA-led UNITA forces
for the next 15 years.
Rwanda
The overthrow of Mobutu, and the current war, was triggered by
the 1994 genocide in Rwanda and the overthrow of the French-backed
"Hutu-power" regime responsible. With French support,
Mobutu allowed the army and militias of the overthrown regime to
regroup in Zaire.
However, the new Rwandan regime of Paul Kagame countered by arming
the Banyamulenge Tutsis, Congolese of the same ethnicity as the
Tutsis who were the victims of the Rwandan genocide.
With the end of the Cold War, the Mobutu regime had outlived its
usefulness to the US, who made no attempt to save it when, in 1996,
Rwanda, Uganda, Burundi, Zimbabwe, Namibia and Angola invaded in
support of an insurrection by a loose coalition that united the
Banyamulenge militias with Kabila's forces, as well as other armed
groups.
In fact, by this time the US was giving military training to the
Kagame regime in Rwanda.
Furthermore, behind Kabila's insurrection, which took the capital,
Kinshasa, in May 1997, stood Western mining interests.
According to the July 2006 Le Monde diplomatique, Kabila's invasion,
and initial administration, were directly funded by a consortium
of the US-based Mineral Fields, Australian company Russel Resources
and the Zimbabwe-based Ridgepointe Overseas.
However in 1998, Kabila tried to re-negotiate the deals made with
these companies, which brought him into conflict with Rwanda and
Uganda and their allied militias in the east of the country (which
reverted to the name DRC when Mobutu fell).
Zimbabwe, Angola, Namibia and Sudan came to Kabila's aid. This
was the beginning of the current war.
The genocidal methods of all parties led to a proliferation of
armed militias, with many groups originating as local defensive
formations but becoming predatory. Ethnic and tribal divisions multiplied.
Mining interests
In this environment the Western mineral companies adopted new methods.
Rather than trying to obtain large-scale mining concessions from
the non-existent central government, they set
Fuelling this has been a by-product of the IT boom in the West:
an explosion in demand for a metal called coltan that is used in
the manufacture of mobile phones and personal computers. up mineral
processing operations that bought ores off local suppliers.
These local suppliers were the various contending militias. The
mineral trade has thus provided the various armed factions with
both a means of buying weapons and profits for which to fight.
Between 2000 and 2007, the price of coltan increased eightfold.
The coltan rush led to a falling out between Rwanda and Uganda,
as entrepreneurs in both countries tried to maximise their involvement
in the trade.
This in turn led to splits in their Congolese proxies and further
escalation of the violence.
In 2001, Kabila was assassinated by his bodyguards and replaced
by his son Joseph Kabila, who in 2003 signed a peace agreement that
left the DRC as a loose collection of four warlord fiefdoms in a
state of armed truce, with violence periodically erupting between
them.
Conflict between smaller militias at the local level has never
ceased. Neither have depredations by the remnants of the Rwandan
"Hutu-power" forces.
The current offensive by Nkunda is allegedly to defend the Banyamulenge
Tutsis from these forces, however it is actually driven by the demands
of his Rwandan backers for coltan.
Because coltan-containing ores are suited to labour intensive,
small-scale mining operations, the coltan boom gave the West little
interest in stability in the DRC.
however, according to Le Monde diplomatique, cobalt, uranium and
other minerals that require more capital-intensive, large-scale
mining operations, are now becoming more profitable than coltan
- giving the West an incentive to impose some sort of order.
This may explain why the bloodshed in the DRC has finally become
a major news story in the West, accompanied by calls for a "humanitarian"
intervention.
However, what African-American revolutionary Malcolm X said in
1964 remains true today: "The basic cause of most of the trouble
in the Congo right now is the intervention of outsiders - the fighting
that is going on over the mineral wealth of the Congo and over the
strategic position that the Congo represents on the African continent.
"And in order to justify it, they are
trying to make
it appear that the people are savages."
This article first appeared in
Green Left Weekly.