March 1, 2005 11:51 | by Kate
Hudson
How the US has left Europe bristling with its illegal nuclear
weaponry.
THE US administration continues to pursue its hostile hype against
Iran. Only now, it seems that actions have been added to the endless
rhetoric.
Recently, the US investigative journalist Seymour Hersch asserted
that US special forces had been in Iran looking for supposed nuclear
targets.
Last week, it was reported that US spy drones are flying over Iran,
attempting to detect illegal nuclear activities. Either of these
would be an extreme provocation to the Iranian government and they
may be intended as such. Fortunately, no intemperate response has
come from Tehran.
But to set these US activities in the world of reality, not warmongering
fantasy, we need to remind ourselves what Mohammed El-Baradei, the
head of the International Atomic Energy Agency said last week.
In an interview in The Washington Post, Mr El-Baradei stated again
that there is no evidence to support the claim that Iran is developing
nuclear weapons, neither as a result of inspections nor as a result
of intelligence.
Russia has now become involved in the ongoing row, as President
Putin has stated that he is convinced that Iran is not trying to
build nuclear weapons.
Yet, while this dispute continues and the US administration again
tries to make something out of nothing, we should also be aware
of what the US is doing closer to home.
Last week, there was quite a bit of press coverage about the extent
of the US nuclear weaponry that is littered across Europe under
the guise of NATO-480 free-fall nuclear bombs.
Of these, 110 are located at the Lakenheath airbase in East Anglia,
150 are stationed at three bases across Germany, 90 in south-eastern
Turkey, 90 in Italy and 20 each in Belgium and the Netherlands.
With the exception of Britain, which also has around 200 of its
own nuclear weapons, these countries are non-nuclear weapons states.
This clearly breaches international law because the nuclear non-proliferation
treaty prohibits a nuclear state from transferring nuclear weapons
to a non-nuclear weapons state. Indeed, it prohibits a non-nuclear
state from receiving such weapons.
But, while Iraq is bombed on trumped-up charges and Iran faces
the same dangers, this illegal behaviour is brushed under the carpet
and ignored.
While NATO has been out of the public spotlight recently, upstaged
by the "coalition of the willing," we would do well to
heed the dangers. This is a massively armed expansionist military
alliance with a nuclear first-use policy. Who can say where these
nuclear weapons will be used. Iran?
So, NATO is a major problem for peace campaigners in Europe. But
so too is the proposed European constitution.
If adopted, it will clearly result in the increased militarisation
of Europe, promoting improved military capabilities, for operations
"based on military means" and the massive extension of
the EU capacity for interventions.
Worryingly, the constitution only commits itself to the principles
of the UN Charter, not to abiding by the specifics, which could
leave the way open for non-UN mandated military interventions by
the EU.
The last thing that we want is for the recent orientation by the
US towards illegal interventions to be pursued by Europe and enshrined
in a new constitution. So, when the US makes its belligerent statements
about other countries, winding up the pressure about nuclear proliferation
and treaty compliance, let's remember to look in our own backyard.
Europe is bristling with illegal US nukes, and many of Europe's
political leaders are eager to go down the path of European military
interventionism. These are both issues that we need to expose and
oppose.
CND is organising a conference dealing with all these issues in
Manchester on Saturday March 5, entitled For a Europe of Peace.
The conference is jointly organised with Le Mouvement de la Paix
- the French peace movement and speakers and participants are coming
from across Europe. Please join us, details are on our web site
at http://www.cnduk.org
Kate Hudson is chairwoman of CND. This article first appeared in
The
Morning Star.
See also
Heather
Wokusch - Bush Administration and WMD