On the New Wave of
Social Protest in Germany
|
On the new wave of social protest in Germany
Germanys Party of Democratic Socialists explains why thousands
of the Bundesrepubliks citizens are taking to the streets.
This summer Germany is struck by a new wave of social protest.
Beginning on 3 August, 2004, and occurring every week since, so-called
"Monday rallies" with tens of thousands of pariticipants
are taking place in 150-200 German cities, great and small. The
term refers to the famous demonstrations of the year 1989, when
mass rallies forced the then GDR government to listen to the peoples
demands for more freedom and democratic rights. To the indignation
of the present Social Democratic-Green government the marchers
of today want the government to listen to their protests against
a package of measures to dismantle the welfare state, unprecedented
in the whole history of the Federal Republic of Germany. For 2
October a huge nation-wide demonstration in Berlin is planned.
In the focus of the protests is the so-called Hartz IV law, adopted
in July, 2004 by all parliamentary parties except the PDS and
due to come into force on 1 January, 2005. This law is the fourth
part of a whole package, worked out by a tripartite commission
of capital, labour and academic representatives, chaired by Volkswagen
personnel manager Peter Hartz. The commission was called by the
government to reform the German labour market and to fight unemployment,
which remains at a nation-wide high of 8-10 %. Hartz IV involves
a series of harsh measures designed to pressure the long-term
unemployed into making more effort to find a new job. In fact,
they amount to brutal worsening of their overall material conditions.
The main changes are:
- The time an unemployed person can receive an earnings-related
benefit (Arbeitslosengeld) (around two thirds of the
last net earnings on the basis of individually paid insurance
contributions) is reduced to a standard 12 months for everybody.
Until now the maximum was 32 months for people over 55 years
of age and the corresponding working years and insurance contributions.
- After 12 months everybody falls into the category of long-term
unemployed entitled to a new standard pay called "unemployment
benefit II" (Arbeitslosengeld II ALG II),
which is on the level of the present social welfare pay, the
subsistence minimum. The amount is 345 Euro for the West German
lander (federal states) and 331 for the lander in the East of
Germany, plus modest extras for housing and heating. Hitherto,
after entitlement to Arbeitslosengeld run out, people
received an unemployment benefit of around 50 % called Arbeitslosenhilfe,
dependent, partly, on the income of the spouse and of proven
efforts actively to look for a new job. Now, in fact, Arbeitslosenhilfe
will be cancelled and the former unemployment benefit merged
with the social welfare pay on the latters low level.
Receiving ALG II is only possible on the following conditions:
- Firstly, the income of the spouse or with single
people every kind of property (flat, car, land, savings,
life insurance, pensions insurance
) is fully taken into
account. Only after having sold and consumed most of this, has
one a right to ALG II. Trade unions statistics say that
more than 300,000 people in East Germany will get nothing under
this condition.
Secondly, any job offered by the state or private job
agencies must be accepted, irrespective of pay below standard
levels, qualification or location, even if a long distance from
the workers residence. Otherwise ALG II will be
cut or stopped altogether. Until now the unemployed person was
entitled to a new job paid on standard level and corresponding
in general to his/her qualification. Municipalities, welfare
organisations and others are requested to create work opportunities
on a pay of 1-2 Euros per hour as an additional income for ALG
II recipients. These must also be accepted by everybody.
Trade unions, welfare agencies, large parts of public opinion
and the PDS are unanimous in their judgement that Hartz IV will
not contribute to the solution of the unemployment problem but
worsen the social situation by a degree unseen in German post-war
history:
- Hartz IV is an austerity program entitled to reduce social
expenditure at the expense of the unemployed. It will not create
any jobs with living wages, but further fuel wage dumping and
destroy normal jobs.
- Hartz IV is annihilating peoples qualifications. By
forcing everybody to accept any job, qualified people are pushed
into low level work from where there is no return.
- Hartz IV is reducing mass purchasing power and domestic consumer
demand, which is detrimental to growth rates of the German economy
fuelled presently by exports alone.
- Hartz IV will widen the gap between rich and poor in Germany
at breathtaking speed. According to trade union prognoses the
number of poor people could rise in 2005 from 2.8 to 4.5 million.
The number of children forced to live on social welfare will
increase from now 1.5 million to 2.0 million. People will more
quickly arrive at the brink of poverty because of cutting the
length of times during which people are entitled to receive
earnings-related unemployment benefit.
- Hartz IV is a gross violation of human dignity. People are
punished for losing their jobs through no fault of their own,
by the failure of the welfare state. They are arbitrarily pressured
under inhumane social conditions in a country where the number
of millionaires is one of the highest in the world and is constantly
rising.
The "Monday rallies" have started as in 1989
in East Germany and have there reached here broadest scale.
While public support for the marchers demands is 67 % in
Germany, it is 85 % in the East. The reasons are:
- The number of people affected by Hartz IV is much higher in
the East with the unemployment rate the double of the Wests
(18 19 %) and the people depending now on Arbeitslosenhilfe
also considerably higher.
- Pressuring the unemployed into looking for a new job by cutting
their benefits is felt to be a bitter mockery here, where there
are about 35 unemployed people for every available job.
- Establishing different amounts of ALG II for East and
West Germans is seen by the people in the East as continuously
treating them as second-class citizens. Having lived in the
socially more equal society of the GDR, they are more sensitive
to facts of social injustice.
The PDS is playing an active role in this movement which has
grown from the grass-roots level and is organised by local and
regional alliances of unemployed associations, citizens
rights and welfare organisations, helped by some trade unions.
The PDS is requested to provide arguments and alternative proposals,
propaganda materials, give support through its infrastructure,
and mobilise its members and sympathisers to take an active part
in the demonstrations. We are deeply convinced that no party or
political organisation should try to take the lead of the movement
and to instrumentalise it for its own political ends. The activists
of the movement are very sensitive to such attempts which would
be detrimental to the movements development. Therefore all
accusations of the government and a part of the media, that the
PDS has artificially fuelled the demonstrations for its own political
benefit, are pure propaganda and far from the real causes of the
matter. People are enraged by the governments policies and
not just blindly following PDS slogans.
True, the PDSs popularity has grown in the wake of the
protests. The people are honouring by this the consistent stance
of our party against the governments anti-social policies
from the very beginning. PDS deputies in the Bundestag voted against
all steps of the "Hartz" plan. They put forward many
alternative proposals hitherto ignored by the governing majority.
The lander where the PDS is in coalition governments have on our
initiative refused supporting the laws in the upper house, the
Bundesrat. Now, we see our main task in bringing to peoples
minds our ideas contrary to Schroeders anti-social "Agenda
2010," concentrated in our "Social agenda", thus
demonstrating that the neo-liberal course of the government is
not without alternative.
The PDS supplies Spectre and other English-language publications
with informative articles such as this without attributing them
to any individual author. Thanks to Helmut Ettinger, who is responsible
for this service, for sending us this piece.
|
|
SPECTREZINE
Homepage
Weblog
Spectremail
Contact
LATEST
FEATURES
The
Last War of the 20th Century - Part Eleven - by Jan Marijnissen and Karel
Glastra van Loon
The
End of Democracy - by Steve McGiffen
Gene
seeks Farmer - by Kartika Liotard MEP
EU-India
Free Trade Talks: In Whose Interest? by Christa Wichterich
Water
Thieves - by Steve McGiffen
Global
security: too vital an issue to be left to NATO and the Right - by Tiny
Kox
Flexicurity,
false promises, and the EU's renamed Constitution
LATEST
NEWS FROM
THE WEBLOG
Weblog-
Homepage
Macedonia and EU membership
Turbulent times for Eurozone
Left Euro-MPs Attack
Turkish condemnation of Human Rights Campaigner
France Breached Nuclear
Non-Proliferation Treaty
“The hope for the reunification
of Cyprus is back”
Call of La Via Campesina
for April 17th, International Day of Peasant Struggle
CATEGORIES
Africa
Book Reviews
Corporate Crime
Current Issues
Economy and Society
East Asia
Editorial
Environment
Europe
Global Resistance
Latin America/Caribbean
Middle East
North America
Progressive Press
War
ARCHIVES
News
Review 2001-04
Features
2001
Features 2002
Features 2003-04
|