A Socialist
Party USA Response
to President George W. Bush's State of the Union Address
and to the Democratic Response
by Rick VanWie.
Co-Vice Chair, Socialist
Party USA
On January
29, 2002 President George W. Bush gave his first "official"
State of the Union Address since taking office. As an opposition party in the United States,
the Socialist Party USA offers this response to the President's
speech, and to the Democratic response.
Fellow Americans,
and workers around the world:
The tragic
events of September 11, 2001 will never be forgotten.
The victims and their families are in the thoughts and
prayers of Socialist Party USA members around America and the
world. Those who have lost their jobs in the economic
downturn of the past year -- accelerated since the terrorist
attacks -- are foremost in our minds.
Since it was
founded in 1901, the Socialist Party has stood against acts
of individual terror and terrorism.
The SPUSA recommits to this position.
There is no substitute for working class action.
There is no replacement for justice achieved when working
people organize for justice. There is nothing as permanent as the peace
achieved when people around the globe demand peace.
Those who support
terror and terrorism stand against what the Socialist Party
has advocated for the past 100 years.
While the Socialist Party USA calls for working-class
solidarity across racial, sexual, religious and national divides,
terrorists are satisfied to summarily judge and condemn -- and
even murder -- based on national origin, sex or religion. Where the SPUSA calls for a new economic order
owned and run by workers, terrorists choose working people as
their victims. At the
very least, the Socialist Party USA wants to expand our democracy
to include "minor" and "third" parties though
drastic changes in our ballot access laws and by the replacement
of the Electoral College with a system of Proportional Representation.
Many terrorists support one-party states and dictatorial
regimes that openly persecute women and religious and ethnic
minorities.
In the State
of the Union Address, President George W. Bush revealed his
agenda for the next year. Although the speech contained many points,
details and anecdotes, it is clear that the President's main
priorities are:
1) Win the
War Against Terrorism
2) Protect
the Homeland
3) Revive the
Economy
The Democratic Response varied only in the details of how this would
be accomplished.
The thrust of the President's speech centers on one element -- stability
at home and abroad. By
winning the "War on Terrorism", "Protecting the
Homeland" and "Reviving the Economy", President
Bush claims that we will live in a more prosperous and peaceful
world. That people need
not fear the terror of the terrorists nor the secret police.
For 100 years, the Socialist Party has recognized the universal desire
for peace, freedom and prosperity.
Socialists sacrificed their lives organizing Labor Unions
in America decades before they were legal.
The Socialist Party advocated a social security system
years before it was initiated.
Suffrage for Women was a plank of the Socialist Party
Platform well before women got the vote in America.
Small farmers, independent shop owners and small business
people fought with the Socialist Party against the rising tide
of monopolies that continue to this day to prevent workers from
producing for themselves, and put family enterprises out of
business.
Currently, President Bush's agenda is a call for peace and security.
However, neither what he nor what the Democrats have
proposed will accomplish any of the three points above.
War does not bring peace. Restrictions on our civil liberties do not
bring security. Massive
tax cuts for the rich and corporations do not bring prosperity.
This is not to say that practical measures should not be taken.
Extra security at airports, including the presence of
the Armed Forces has been a reality in many countries for years
and is at the most inconvenient.
Having defense forces patrolling the skies, borders and
waters of America in a time when passenger jet liners have been
used as weapons is common sense.
Increasing benefits for unemployed workers is a step
in the right direction. Pay raises for our soldiers -- many of who must depend on food stamps
while in the military -- is long over due.
But the failure of war to bring peace, and injustice and persecution
to bring security is not rhetoric, it is history. The result of World War I was World War II. Three years of fighting on the Korea peninsula
resulted in 60 years of a divided nation.
The deaths of 58,000 Americans and hundreds of thousands
of Vietnamese in Vietnam could not stop that war.
Sending Japanese-Americans to internment camps did not
cause the defeat of Japan.
Likewise, persecution of socialists in the United States
during McCarthyism did not lead to the demise of the Eastern
Block or the Soviet Union, and did not prevent revolution in
Cuba. The answer to
the Great Depression was FDR's New Deal social spending and
the restrictions on monopoly capital through anti-trust laws,
not the "laissez-faire" policies of Herbert Hoover.
Tragic examples of the failure of US foreign policy can be seen in
our own recent past. The
United States government supported and funded the violent and
repressive regime of Saddam Hussein.
Iraq's war with Iran resulted in the death of over one
million Iraqi and Irani soldiers. Around that time, the US funded Islamic extremist
groups (that would later become the Taliban) in Afghanistan
that were resisting the Soviet invasion.
A key ally of the United States in the Afghanistan resistance
was Osama Bin-Laden. Bin Laden turned against the United States
after Iraq invaded Kuwait, and US deployed forces in Saudi Arabia
(home to Islam's holy city, Mecca) as part of the military response
to the invasion.
Domestically, post September 11 solid bi-partisan support for "anti-terrorist"
laws threatens our constitutional rights and civil liberties.
Although disturbing, they are not without precedent.
Both Democrats and Republicans supported the World War
I era Anti-Sedition Laws that took away Americans right to dissent.
Those who protested the war were imprisoned.
Democratic President Franklin Delano Roosevelt signed
the executive order that put Japanese-Americans in concentration
camps for five years. Bi-partisan support remained strong for many
years. Also, Democrats
and Republicans supported the red-baiting of the McCarthyist
era. These laws caused many hard-working, pro-union Americans to lose
their jobs if they were even suspected of being a "socialist"
or "communist". Some
went to jail.
Recently however, the threat comes from the bi-partisan support of
the creation of the Office of Homeland Security, whose director
-- former Pennsylvania governor Tom Ridge -- is unaccountable
to anyone but the President.
No one can vote him out of office, and there are no impeachment
proceedings to remove the Director. There is little statutory definition of what
authority this Cabinet-Level office has.
Another
threat is the U.S.A. P.A.T.R.I.O.T
Law (the Uniting and Strengthening America By Providing Appropriate
Tools Required To Intercept and Obstruct Terrorism Law). This
new complicated statute gives law enforcement the right to detain
Americans almost indefinitely. It also allows deportation of immigrants who "associate"
with groups the government identifies as hostile. Furthermore, the U.S.A. P.A.T.R.I.O.T. Law
has a vaguely worded definition of "domestic terrorist"
and domestic terrorism. Like
the Anti-Sedition laws of the early twentieth century, the potential
exists for all of those who protest government policy publicly
to be arrested as a "terrorist".
Combined with President Bush's recently signed Executive
Order that allows terrorists to be tried in a secret military
tribunal with no appeal, the potential for tragedy is great.
Peace and prosperity can only arise from a culture based on social,
political and economic justice for all. In the long run, ending war, poverty, violence, unemployment and
other social ills will require transforming our society. The Socialist Party stands for the creation
of a Democratic-Socialist society in order to meet those long
term goals.
In the meantime
President Bush and the Republicans and Democrats in Congress
can take concrete non-violent action to fight terrorism and
promote economic and social justice at home and abroad.
We call upon the President and Congress to take the following
steps:
1) Immediately
stop the bombing in Afghanistan.
This will free up approximately the one billion dollars
a month the US is spending on the war.
2) Immediately
put the one billion dollars per month into use.
Divide the money between:
a) Life -long
pensions for the families of the victims of the September 11
attacks, including the Police and Firefighters who lost their
lives;
b) Humanitarian
relief efforts in Afghanistan and Pakistan;
c) Unemployment
compensation, health insurance, job training, and low interest
education loans for unemployed workers;
d) Investment
in rebuilding our public schools, and provide daycare for those
who need it, and invest in other infrastructure rebuilding programs,
such as road repair;
e) Investment
in the cleanup of our environment including the clean up of
"Ground Zero";
f) Investment
in rebuilding New York City
3) Set up an international
Court to deal with the problem of Terrorism.
An international court would try and convict anyone around
the world who was arrested for committing terrorist acts in
a foreign country, or over national borders.
This would support the universal desire for rule of law
over terrorism.
4) Work to
end the crisis between Palestine and Israel, including decreasing
US aid to Israel and extending immediate direct aid to Palestine.
5) Immediately suspend all foreign aid to countries that suppress
their citizens on the basis of gender, race, age, ability, religion,
and political affiliation.
One requirement of the resumption of foreign aid would
be free and open multi-party elections monitored by the United
Nations.
6) Repeal the U.S.A. P.A.T.R.I.O.T. Act, close the Office of Homeland
Security, and rescind the executive order concerning military
tribunals. Re-dedicate
the US government to not only the protection of our citizens,
but to the protection of our Constitutional Rights.
Of course, these steps will not immediately stop the terrorists,
but neither will spending one billion dollars a month in military
actions that take innocent civilian lives.
However, these steps will not only save those who are
traditionally the losers in all wars -- civilian populations
--but they also have the added plus of putting an end to the
impulse for the terrorists of the future. It is most likely that for every death from US military action,
that another is willing to seek revenge.
If the US stops military action now, and appeals to the
universal desire for peace, justice and rule of law, then it
will be saving lives today and tomorrow.
By creating an atmosphere of international cooperation
through a through a pursuit of economic, political and social
justice the option of violence and terror will no longer be
appealing.
It has been and will be a hard and long road to true peace, justice
and stability at home and abroad.
No one action or even set of actions will instantly resolve
this crisis. But by
choosing peaceful non-violent methods of resolving this crisis
and protecting our constitutional rights here at home the United
States will not only reflect the best in America, it will be
sharing in the common values of peace, justice and prosperity
held by the workers of all countries.
We urge the
President and Congress to take these bold first steps.