As the World Social Forum in
Mumbai (Bombay) drew to a close earlier this week, the parliamentarians
present adopted the following statement.
Final Declaration of Fourth
World Parliamentary Forum, Mumbai, India, January 19, 2004
1. During the past three years, the regular meetings of the
World Parliamentary Forum (WPF) took place in Porto Alegre,
Brazil. This January 2004, together with the World Social Forum
(WSF), for the first time it meets in Asia, in Mumbai, India,
and at a time of a deepening international crisis. The Fourth
World Parliamentary Forum takes here a special importance.
2. In the context of the globalisation, the powers of Parliamentarians
and Legislators to call executive governments to account and
to legislate freely have been deliberately undermined. We reassert
our legitimate authority to hold accountable national and global
authorities. We will work to reverse this erosion of our sovereign
law making powers.
3. Four years after the Seattle fiasco, the collapse of the
fifth Ministerial Conference of the World Trade Organisation
(WTO) in Cancun has shown that the present trade system is not
only in a legitimacy crisis, but that it is breaking apart.
Since the gap between the rich and the poor is widening dramatically
under the current trade system and the WTO rule, the myth that
unfettered free trade is the key to global prosperity is utterly
discredited. It is high time now to re-shape international trade
rules and promote fare, equitable and sustainable trade, which
is beneficial to all nations and all people, so that it serve,
rather than obstruct, the cause of social and sustainable development.
The emergence of new international alliances such as the G20
and the G90 indicate that the need for change is now felt more
broadly than ever.
We disapprove of the invitation made by the Swiss to host a
mini-ministerial of the WTO alongside the Davos World Economic
Forum of January 2005.
We, the participants of the WPF, are deeply committed to the
idea that another economic and trade paradigm, which benefits
the majority of the populations all over the world, is possible
and necessary. We call Parliamentarians and Legislators to initiate
and support a broad debate in the respective Parliaments on
self-reliant development, the remaking of the global trade system,
respecting and including views and demands of the social movements
and civil society in general and giving the UN the democratic
control of the multilateral financial and economic institutions.
4. The existing and projected free trade areas between very
unequal economies as FTAA has not produced a fair redistribution
of wealth, more and better jobs, increase of salaries and sustainable
social and environmental development. On the contrary, together
with irresponsible government policy making, they have led to
a concentration of production structures in the hands of multinational
companies, violation of human and workers rights, tax
deficit and privatisation of common goods such as water and
energy.
Lifting all trade barriers, eroding trade preferences between
unequal partners does not automatically lead to more welfare
for the whole of the populations. Focus must be given to the
diversification of economy, strengthening of ecologically sound
infrastructures, and to education, health, transport system
without which the country cannot take benefits from international
trade openings.
Each country must have the right to develop its own economic
and political potential. We are in favour of a priority fo regional
integration based on popular consultation and consensus, democratic
decision-making and control, respect for human and social rights
as defined by international pacts and covenants, sustainable
development and cultural diversity.
We, as Parliamentarians and Legislators, are determined to take
up these demands and translate them into legislative proposals
for a peaceful regional integration with respect for social
rights, rural development, protection and diversification of
local economies, food sovereignty and cultural diversity.
We shall, as well, demand the implementation of a world taxation
system (like a Tobin Tax on international financial
transactions, and on corporate benefits
) that will contribute
to finance third world countries development.
5. The GATS negotiations inside the WTO present a threat to
public services in many countries. Requests, mainly coming from
the major industrialised countries, to open up markets for the
commercialisation of education, public health, culture and access
to water and energy, reflect strong economic interests of corporations.
Privatisation and lack of regulation leads to private monopoly
and does not serve the interests of the poor, but undermine
them even more of their basic needs. Primary education itself,
so essential for social and gender equality, is threatened by
present policies.
We shall take initiatives in our respective Parliaments and
Legislative Assemblies to demand from our governments to review
and reverse the GATS negotiations, so that provisions maybe
introduced to protect public services and guaranty the right
of public authorities to regulate. We support the initiatives
of city councils and local self-government throughout the world
to declare themselves GATS free.
6. The issue of water is presently taking a special importance
on the international scene. It is thus necessary to clearly
state that access to water is a fundamental right, which cannot
be touched for profit making reasons. Water is not a commodity.
It is an essential and unsubstitutable natural element for food
production, daily life needs and many other activities.
As has been underlined in Rome Declaration of December 2003,
it is urgent to formally recognise water as a common, public
good, according to the non-market-economy, and to exclude it
from the category of market goods and services.
Poverty and lack of access to water resources are the cause
of millions of death in developing countries. Today, while 70
% of the water is used, in the world, for productive activities,
so many people still have no access to safe drinking water.
Health is a major issue but neo-liberal economic globalisation
and structural adjustment plan increase sanitary emergencies
and decrease access to drugs and primary health care, as they
lead to the dismantling of public health structures. Moreover,
access to drug is limited by high prices and patent of pharmaceutical
companies.
We, as Parliamentarians and Legislators, will support the international
campaigns launched by social movements and civil society organisations
to protect the right of access of all to water, and for the
recognition of health as a fundamental human right.
7. We shall fight in our respective Parliaments and legislative
bodies for land reforms and for land to be given to the tillers
in whichever country this task remains incomplete.
8. External debt under the regime of the IMF and the World Bank
has been an efficient tool to prevent any local social economic
development. While James Baker has insisted since the end of
the 1980s that Argentina has to pay its debt contracted under
a dictatorship, he is now asking the Club of Paris to cancel
the debt of Iraq
because it was contracted under a dictatorship.
Not only is the double standard unacceptable, it also shows
that the system of the debt is a key for economic and political
dominance. The odious debt question (legacy of apartheid
and dictatorial regimes) is but the tip of the iceberg of the
whole issue.
We, as Parliamentarians and Legislators, commit ourselves to
the cancellation of foreign debt of developing countries, striving
at the same time for the establishment of fair and transparent
arbitration processes (FTAP), which enable the concerned citizens
to participate in the allocation of funds free from the debt
circuit.
9. The war led by the Bush administration in Iraq has represented
one of the most ominous developments in the international political
situation, last year. It shows the full implications of the
Bush doctrine of pre-emptive war, of United States
unilateralism. It has worsened the dynamics of war threatening
todays world, creating new obstacles to reaching necessary
political settlements in many regions, like in the case of Palestine
and Israel, of Mindanao in the Philippines or of the Korean
peninsula. A new impulse has been given to arm race and nuclear
proliferation. It is evident that we did not support the Saddam
Hussein regime; we support democracy everywhere. We strongly
oppose the unilateralist military and political intervention
of the US in Iraq and other countries. We reject the attempts
of the US to undermine legitimate international political processes,
specifically the United Nations.
In the name of antiterrorism, basic Human Rights are denied,
and populations like migrants and asylum seekers find themselves
in a more vulnerable situation than ever before. The US government
is freeing itself from international laws and conventions, as
is especially shown in the scandalous development of Guantanamo.
Many of the violent conflicts in Africa are to a large extent
are due to the role of few Western Multinational Corporations
eager to confiscate the resources of this continent. There have
been attempts by the business sector to establish codes of conduct
that address social, environmental and human rights issues.
These issues (UN Global Compact, International Business
Council for Sustainable Development) have been used for greenwashing.
Corporate social responsibility therefore urgently
needs independent monitoring an shall not weaken national legislations.
Anti-drug anti-terrorist legislations are too often used against
social movements, as dramatically shown in the case of Bolivia
and Colombia. In Colombia, up to three millions peasants have
been displaced in favour of corporations, trade-unionists are
being assassinated, Indian communities are exterminated, there
is impunity for human rights violations while the US intervention
and extension of the war threaten civil society and neighbouring
countries like Ecuador, Venezuela and Brazil.
One major international duty for Parliamentarians and Legislators
is today to fight the Bush doctrine of pre-emptive war,
to extend solidarity with peoples in zones of conflicts, to
defend Human Rights, to defend the Right of the peoples to decide
their own future through peaceful and democratic means and put
an end to arms race, including a universal ban on nuclear weapons.
We, Parliamentarians and Legislators, have the duty to
act as peacemakers and to look for the end of violence. We commit
ourselves to strive for a new world order based on respect of
the UN Charter principles and international conventions. We
support a reform of the UN system, to begin with a restructuring
and enlargement of the UN Security Council in order to increase
the representation of developing countries and reinforce the
legitimacy and effectiveness of the UN system.
10. We, as Parliamentarians and Legislators, commit ourselves
to strive for a worldwide ratification campaign of the International
Criminal Court (ICC) Statute and urge national Parliamentarians
not to sign Bilateral Immunity Agreements (BIAs) with the US
despite the loss of US aid.
11. The combined impact of the implementation worldwide of neo-liberal
economic policies and of the dynamics of war is very deep. There
is a constant erosion of democratic rule and social rights,
with processes of remilitarisation in a number of countries.
It favours the rise of religious fundamentalisms and sectarianisms,
as well as the danger of terroris, which seeks to disrupt the
unity of people. It contributes to multiply obstacles to the
assertion of gender equality and of minorities rights.
We oppose all dictatorships.
We, Parliamentarians and Legislators, recognise the specific
importance, such a context, of the present rise of the movements
against corporate and military globalisation, of the workers
struggles to defend social rights and public services, of the
worldwide anti-war mobilisations and, within them, of the social
forum processes. New solidarities are being tied, international
convergences for common actions are being built, alternatives
to the dominant economic and military world order are here being
collectivised.
12. In South Asia especially, where the Fourth WPF meets, we,
Parliamentarians and Legislators, recognise the paramount importance
of forging and broadening the unity of the people against the
current corporate project of globalisation spearheaded by the
IMF-WB-WTO triumvirate. In order to achieve this project, such
forces, in obnoxious attempts, play up differences based on
ethnicity, race, religion and historical feudal legacies like
the caste. Therefore:
- We recognise the strivings of the people in South Asia to
end regional conflicts and establish peace through a process
of constructive dialogue to resolve disputes and strengthen
regional cooperation.
- We recognise the increasing assertion of the womens
movement in opposing gender discrimination and in establishing
gender justice, which, again, faces challenges not just from
neo-liberal economic policies but also from forces of fundamentalism
and revivalism.
- We extend support to the assertion of hitherto disposed and
socially oppressed groups to achieve social justice.
- We note and extend our support to the concerns of ethnic and
religious minorities for a just and equal social order, which
will enable their participation as partners and not adversaries.
- In this, we recognise the need for opposition to not just
the governments but also forces of fundamentalism, obscurantism
and sectarianism, which disrupt the unity of the people. We
condemn all forms of terrorism, including individual and state
terrorism.
The respect of cultural identities (including the right to speak
ones own language) is an integral part of human sustainable
development. We, Parliamentarians and Legislators from all countries,
engage to protect the world against a single and homogeneous
culture and prevent xenophobia. WPF shall mobilise against discriminations
of all kinds be it racial, gender, religious, caste,
economical, political, social or territorial. Every citizen
of the world must be treated with dignity.
13. The World Parliamentary Forum and the International Parliamentary
Network (IPN), constituted after the First WPF of Porto Alegre,
in 2001, has already initiated several campaigns on issues like
the taxation of financial transactions, the GATS and the defence
of public services, on sustainable development at the occasion
of the Johannesburg Conference (Rio + 10) and on the WTO at
the occasion of the Cancun conference. These campaigns remain.
For 2004, it will mobilise in particular on the following issues:
14. March 20 will be an international day of mobilisation against
war and the Bush doctrine. It is an essential occasion to fight
for a world of peace, to extend our solidarity toward peoples
in struggle (like in Palestine) and to address the political
issue of zones of conflicts (as Iraq, Palestine-Israel, Pakistan-India,
Mindanao and the Korean peninsula), and to integrate better
the demand for a universal, general ban on nuclear weapons in
the overall peace movement.
15. The issue of social and environmental development
will be concretely raised at the occasion of the June 2004 UNCTAD
meeting in Sao Paulo, and at when attempt to revive the WTO
rule will be made. We shall follow closely any future negotiations
concerning the WTO to express the need for a fair trade for
all people.
16. We express firmly our support to the social transformation
process in Venezula and reject any kind of foreign intervention.
17. The first meeting of the Latin American Branch of the International
Parliamentary Network in Caracas, in November 2003, has adopted
a clear statement against the present FTAA negotiations, which
took place without any participation of Parliaments of the concerned
countries, which violated Constitutions and exclude the sovereign
participation of the people. We fully support this assessment
and call for a stop of the negotiations. We share the demand
of the Latin American branch to bring cases of violations of
human rights of migrants before the international bodies and
to start to work in order to ensure the free movements of persons
all over the continent.
We support legislative initiatives to recognise all human, social,
civic and labour rights of immigrant workers, especially in
the USA and the European Union (EU).
Since decades, Colombia is a country with a worldwide negative
record of human rights violations. Since the beginning of the
presidential term of Alvaro Uribe Velez, the situation has even
worsened. We urge the government to immediately implement the
recommendation of the United Nations, and particularly dismantle
paramilitary groups, return to the constitutional democratic
rights revoking the presidential decrees, unconditionally protect
social activists, human rights defenders and Parliamentarians
of the political opposition, at present under constant death
threat. We also urge the Colombian government to negotiate a
humanitarian agreement in order to effectively protect the civil
population from war violence and to reinitiate peace negotiations.
This agreement would be the first step for the release of Ingrid
Betancourt, presidential candidate kidnapped almost two years
ago, and all the other victims of kidnappings in the country.
18. The European Parliamentary Forum met for the first time
in November 2003, at the occasion of the Second European Social
Forum. The European pole of the IPN will support the trade union
days of mobilisatin, April 2 and 3, and the day of action for
a social Europe of Mai 9, called by the coordination of social
movements.
19. The WPF welcomes the proposal of creating a South Asian
Parliamentary Forum to carry forward the Parliamentary movement
for the ideals laid down in the final declaration adopted at
WPF 2004, in the region.
20. The WPF and the IPN will mobilise itself in defence of Parliamentarians
facing repression and death threats because of their progressive
engagements.
21. The WPF and the IPN will defend as well progressive social
movements and civil society organisations, and their members,
facing repression. We shall campaign for the abolition of death
penalty everywhere.
22. The WPF, the IPN and its members will continue to support
the world social forum process and the campaigns of social and
citizen movements. They will strengthen their links with them,
and pursue a dialog on the elaboration of alternatives to the
present world order. We shall work closely with the next WSF
organisers in order to have a more active interaction with social
movements.
23. The Fifth regular meeting of the WPF will be held at the
occasion of the next World Social Forum (January 2005, in Porto
Alegre).
For more information
on the WEPF go to http://www.forumparlamentarmundial.rs.gov.br/
and click on English