6th February, 2004
Right wing wants to ban Communists
from European Parliament
In
a further demonstration of how far the political elite of Europe
has now moved from any real commitment to democracy, the ludicrously
-named European People's Party (EPP) is debating whether it
should ban former communists from taking up posts in the European
institutions.
First
victim of this ploy to strengthen the grip of the right would
be Estonia's Siim Kallas, an ex-communist whom the Baltic republic
has nominated to be its Commissioner from 1 May when enlargement
takes place. Kallas, a former prime minister in Estonia, was
a member of the Communist Party of the Soviet Union from 1972
to 1990. The European Parliament has the right to approve all
of the candidates after they have been chosen by EU governments. The EPP is the biggest political group, but
would need the support of other right wing groups if it were
to succeed in its aim of defending democracy by abolishing it.
A
resolution currently being considered by the EPP calls on the
political parties of the European Parliament not to accept anyone
in their ranks who previously served under "oppressive
or totalitarian communist regimes".
President
of the EPP, Wilfried Martens claimed that the EPP "has
always opposed extremes on the left or the right" and this
was a "very delicate matter".
Abolishing democracy is indeed "delicate".
The
leader of the EPP-ED group (which unites the EPP with Britain's
Tories), Hans-Gert Pöttering, said the whole issue "was
raised by the observers [national MPs from the new member states
who have had a special status in the European Parliament since
last year]".
In
language sadly reminiscent of earlier phases in the history
of the German right, Pöttering said that the EPP has to be committed
to "sweeping away" such elements.
Erik
Meijer, MEP, of the Dutch Socialist Party, which forms part
of the Parliament's United Left group (GUE-NGL), condemned the
possible move. "We share a critical attitude to the former
Soviet Union and its oppressive system, as well as its colonialist
attitude to the Baltic States." said Meijer, "but
imitating the USSR is no way to defend democracy. I would be
equally opposed to a blanket ban on people who served in the
Franco or Salazar régimes, or under the Greek colonels. And
if you are to ban former Soviet Communists, why not also ban
people from parties which never criticised the Soviet Union's
actions, such as the Greek or French Communists? Democracy can
only function if people are allowed to express their views,
even if we find such views onerous."
GUE-NGL
leader Francis Wurtz of the French Communist Party (PCF) accused
the PPE of attempting to grab the headlines and distract attention
from the fact that it had supported war with Iraq on the sole,
and as it turned out utterly false grounds, that the country
possessed Weapons of Mass Destruction. "Or why", Wurtz
quipped, "not propose Berlusconi for the Nobel Peace prize?"
Is this simple nostalgia for the Cold War? he wondered.
"Just
what is the PPE looking to achieve with such an outmoded policy?"
asked the United Left leader. "Is it nothing more than
a simple publicity stunt to put its electoral competitors from
the Social Democratic and Liberal parties on the defensive,
as these also include in their ranks a certain number of ´repentant´
former leaders of these countries? Or is it a way of declaring
a real strategy of the current conservative majority in the
EU, that of interpreting enlargement to the East as an act of
revenge, or of a new witch-hunt?"
Election turnout set to reach
new lows in UK
Turnout
in the UK was the lowest in the EU in the last European elections
and is set to get lower. A new poll has shown that only 18 percent
of British people intend to vote in the forthcoming European
elections, even lower than the turnout in the last election,
which, at 24 percent, was the lowest in the EU.
The
poll, commissioned by the UK office of the European Parliament,
surveyed 2,000 people, only nine percent of whom thought that
"Europe" was an important issue for the UK.
In
the last elections - in 1999 - voter turnout varied hugely across
the EU.
Some
countries had very large turnouts, such as Belgium (90 percent),
Luxembourg (86 percent) - Impressive, unless you know that it
is compulsory to vote in these countries!
Elsewhere,
turnout was lower than for national, or even regional elections.
Besides the UK, turnout was also ridiculously low in the Netherlands
and Finland (both 30 percent).
Thanks to EU Observer
for this information.
Global Anti-War Assembly calls
for world-wide participation in March 20 actions
The
General Assembly of the Global Anti-War Movement is calling
on the world to
"fill the streets"
on March 20 to demand an end to the occupation of Iraq.
The
General Assembly of the Anti-War Movement was first convened
on January 19 at the World Social Forum (WSF) in Mumbai (Bombay). The Assembly fulfilled its organisers hopes that it would be the
biggest and most representative meeting of the anti-war movement
since the invasion, with participation and endorsers from around
the world.
The
Assembly ended with the call for an International Day of Action
on March 20,
the anniversary of the attack on Iraq. It calls for all movements
in all continents
to organize mass protests on that day to demand the end of theoccupation
of Iraq. "Different countries will organise protests of
different scales and forms" a spokesperson for the Assembly
said, adding that "the important point is to mark the anniversary
across the world. Resistance in Iraq and internationally is
growing daily and March 20 will be the day when the global resistance
tells not only Bush but all the occupation troops and warmongers
that the movement will not rest until the occupation of Iraq
and Palestine and the 'war against terror'
For
more information, contact marylou@focusweb.org
New study on corruption - lessons from Thailand
A new study from UK progressive research group The
Corner House, Corruption,
Governance and Globalisation: Lessons from the New Thailand
by Dr Pasuk Phongpaichit looks at the viability of the belief
amongst international agencies such as the World Bank that corruption
blocks economic growth and that it comes from a lack of proper
rules and institutions. In
Thailand corruption has in fact gone hand-in-hand with economic
growth when competing factions have invested their 'rents' from
corruption productively. And more rules have not necessarily
meant an end to corruption in the country. The new Thaksin Shinawatra
premiership, while marked by efforts to clean up petty graft
and institute a more regulated market for political favours,
is merely institutionalising forms of corruption centred, US-style,
on the intersection of big business and politics. Popular movements
are crucial in combating corruption. Telecoms tycoon Thaksin
is working hard to weaken them by trying to roll back recent
victories by watchdog institutions, intimidating activists and
laying on pseudo-populist programmes. This briefing paper looks
at all these aspects and provides many insights for international
campaigns addressing corruption. It is now available at http:www.thecornerhouse.org.uk/briefing/29thailand.html