8th February,
2003
WHERE WILL YOU BE MARCHING
ON FEBRUARY 15?
European Parliamentarians
visit Iraq
Powell declaration "shameful
and ridiculous"
A delegation of Euro-MPS visited Iraq this week to examine
conditions there and express their solidarity with the Iraqi
people. United Left group (GUE-NGL) leader Francis Wurtz, who
headed the 32-strong delegation, said that the MEPs rejected
US arguments for war and criticised Wednesday's address to the UN Security Council by Bush
junta henchman Colin Powell..
Commenting on Powell's bizarre performance. Mr Wurtz
said that it was difficult to take seriously such a presentation
to "a special UN Security Council meeting in the presence
of many foreign affairs ministers and the heads of the UN inspectors,
with such poor evidence to support his accusations."
"What Mr. Powell said about the link between Iraq
and al-Qaeda is in total contradiction with the declarations
of the experts of the CIA and the FBI two days ago that after
investigations lasting a year they don't believe that there
is such a link," he added.
Wurtz said the delegation was "representative of
the large majority of Europeans who reject the war" and
believe that "today there is no reason more than yesterday
to accept any military action or preventive strike against Iraq.
We want a complete disarmament of mass destruction weapons in
Iraq, if they existed ... That is the mission of the UN inspectors
not of the US army."
Wurtz stressed that "at the same time, we refuse
any complicity with the Iraqi regime. The only chance for Iraq
today is to co-operate totally. We are supporting the mission
of the UN inspectors. They need time, they need information,
they need co-operation."
The delegation, which met Iraqi and UN officials during
their four-day trip, urged the United Nations and the European
Union to lift sanctions imposed on Baghdad following its 1990
seizure of Kuwait.
Another member of the delegation, Alain Krivine, described
Powell's antics as "shameful and ridiculous".
In Foreign Policy
in Focus, Phyllis Bennis shares this view, saying that "Collin
Powell's presentation wasn't likely to win over anyone not already
on his side." Furthermore, "Hans Blix denied key components
of Powell's claims". Read Powell's
Dubious Case for War. here
Read Tony Benn's interview with Saddam Hussein, broadcast
this week on the UK's Channel 4, at this
website
Anti-War Demonstration
Too Big for George Square
Organisers
of the February 15th anti-war demonstration in Glasgow have
had to change venue as the numbers expected to attend have become
too large for George Square to hold.
The Scottish Coalition for Justice Not War have decided to change
the assembly point for the demonstration to Glasgow Green after
advice from Strathclyde Police that the traditional assembly
point in George Square will not be big enough to hold the numbers
expected.
Organisers expect over 20,000 people will attend a march and
rally outside the Labour Partys Spring Conference at the
SECC on Saturday 15th February. Police and Glasgow City Council
advice is that George Square is only big enough to hold 12,000
safely.
The Scottish Coalition are asking people to assemble on Glasgow
Green between 10.00 and 11.00am to march in time to rally against
a war on Iraq outside the Conference just as the Prime Minister
Tony Blair addresses the 3,500 Labour Party delegates inside
the Conference Centre. The march will move off from Glasgow
Green at 11.00am and arrive at the SECC at 1.30pm.
Tony Blair is scheduled to start his speech at 2.00pm.
Elinor McKenzie, chair of the Scottish Coalition for Justice
Not War said:
Opposition to a war with Iraq is growing not going away.
The demonstration on Saturday 15th February is set to be the
largest demonstration of its kind in the last twenty years.
We are being overwhelmed with an unprecedented number of requests
for information and have already had to order additional leaflets
to cope with the demand. Groups from all over Scotland are coming.
People from as far away as Orkney in the north and Manchester
in England are planning transport to come and many anti-war
groups in the north of England are coming to Glasgow instead
of going to the demonstration being held in London on the same
day. We expect the demonstration will deliver a message he cannot
ignore to Tony Blair that an overwhelming majority of Scots
believe war with Iraq will not be in our name.
Invited speakers to the rally outside the SECC include Tony
Benn; John Swinney; Provost Alex Mosson; the Moderator of the
Church of Scotland; Tommy Sheridan and Arthur Scargill.
Demonstrators also plan to make noise with whistles, drums,
airhorns in a Jericho Rumpus at 2pm to drown out
the start of Tony Blairs speech.
More details and latest developments at www.banthebomb.org scnd@banthebomb.org
Finns don't want war
either
An overwhelming majority of the Finnish people, very
close to four-fifths of the population, are against a war on
Iraq unless approved by the UN, and many would not support it
then, according to a poll by Gallup which revealed that the
war is rejected by a majority of almost all of the world's peoples.
44 percent did not approve military action under any conditions.
A good third of the Finnish people would support a war only
if it had United Nations approval. In almost all EU countries,
25% or less support the war, but the Finns, with only 5% support,
are the least bloodthirsty or perhaps least gullible of Europeans.
The biggest warmongers are Romania (no comment, but how's
the nice new national debt doing, guys?), Britain (whose government
is a puppet of the Bush junta) and Denmark (where large swathes
of the population seem lately to have taken leave of their senses
- or perhaps some kind reader could write with a more scientific
explanation as to why this country, which has a reputation for
fair-mindedness, now has a Haideresque immigration policy and
tail-ends the Bush junta's warmongering.). But nowhere does
it reach half of the adult population.
Commenting on his country's league-topping anti-war
statistic, Left Euro-MP Esko Seppänen said that "Finland
has a long tradition of neutrality in its foreign policy. Membership
of the EU obliged us to change our foreign policy status: we
are no longer a neutral but a non-aligned country - we are not
a member of any military union, neither Nato nor the WEU. The
Finns have had a good collective experience of neutrality and
non-alignment. Life has been politically and socially secure
and the people want everything to continue in that way and don't
see this war as a means of ensuring that." Mr Seppänen,
who represents the Finnish Left Alliance, added that "The
majority do not want our country to join the Nato. The political
elite, however, is not good at resisting the pressure for alignment
which comes through the militarisation of the EU and Nato-interoperability
of its common defence. The great majority of the Finns against
the oil war in Iraq is also a protest against our own elite.
What people are saying is "Do not tie us into conflicts
which are not ours." There is, however, always a danger
that public opinion will change. If the general feeling of insecurity
increases, the Finns may not want to be alone - not even against
the war. The unilateralist Americans are not popular, but they
have their friends even among the Finns. They have the a total
command of sources of information, and this is their strongest
weapon against us."
Q & A on Iraq
You know the war is very, very wrong; you know who the
real terrorists are; you know that thousands, possibly millions
of people are soon going to die horrible deaths so that Americans
can carry on driving gas-guzzling cars. You'd just like more
information so that you can better convince other people of
these things. In Understanding
the US - Iraq Crisis: the World's Response, the UN & International
Law, Phyllis Bennis gives 43 questions and answers on the
current crisis, the history of U.S.-Iraq relations, and alternatives
to war. It's just what you need to read if you find yourself
tongue-tied in the face of the smooth-tongued, the brutal, and
the smiling murderers who are leading us all into this terrible
event. Read it
here
Green Left Weekly, Australia's socialist newspaper,
this week tells its readers that "We can stop the war!". To find out how, and read the latest on Australian
and international affairs, go to this website
*
European Day of Action
against GATS
According to the Financial Times, the European Commission, which
met this week in Brussels, was expected to bow to political
and popular concern about public services, by ruling out
talks in the Doha World Trade Round on further liberalisation
of its health, education, energy and water markets.
Although the officials insisted that many of the activists'
allegations about the World Trade Organisation's role in regulating
public services were exaggerated or wrong, they said they wanted
to avoid fuelling the controversy.
But trade unions and civil society organisations are not satisfied.
This Sunday, 9 February, anti-GATS activists are coming from
all over Europe to join hands in protesting the WTO's General
Agreement on Trade in Services. For more information on this
activity, the European Campaign against GATS and the liberalisation
of trade in services in general, see the GATSwatch website.
here
UK Trade Union leader
says public services would be damaged in the euro
The General Secretary of one of Britain's biggest trade
unions, Bill Morris of the Transport and General Workers' Union
has responded to attempts by government minister Peter Mandelson
to claim that the euro would be good for public services, arguing
that joining the euro would actually damage public services.
In a letter to the Independent, Mr Morris wrote, Has Mr Mandelson forgotten the
impact of the growth and stability pact on the German economy?
Perhaps he can tell me why the euro has not helped public services
in Germany, where the government is now planning to cut public
spending by £35.8 billion by 2006? A similar story can be told
in Ireland, France, Italy and the Netherlands, where spending
is either being frozen or cut.
He concluded, The fact remains: joining the Eurozone
during the lifetime of this Parliament would undermine the UK
Governments efforts to invest for world-class public services.
Thanks to the Euro No
campaign for this information.
Pollution for sale?
"They discuss the so-called win-win scenario, envisioned
under the Kyoto Protocol, but I would like to ask the question,
who is really winning? We are definitely not winning, they are
winning and they are making money out of it," says Sajida
Khan, local resident affected by emissions credit project in
South Africa.
A new briefing from Carbon Trade Watch takes a look
at the newly established system of carbon emissions trading,
whereby heavily polluting factories can buy the right to pollute
from cleaner facilities. The system sounds bizarre, and tends
to produce a negative gut reaction from the left, but could
it work? The briefing takes a look at this new market in pollution
and poses the question as to whether people are being cheated
in the name of sustainable development.
Pollution trading lies at the cross-roads between two of the
most controversial faultines in political-economic debate: is
neo-liberalism the only engine of prosperity for all, or a monopolisation
of global resources for the few? And is the United Nations undergoing
a fatal crisis of legitimacy, or is it the last remaining hope
for world peace and justice?
Carbon Trade Watch researches, monitors and analyses the impacts
and effects of pollution trading markets upon environmental,
social and economic justice. Lights on! can be found here
If you want to find out more about the related issue of energy
privatisation, the Trans National Institute has recently posted
a thorough analysis of what is going on
here
Cover-up at the UN
The "Guernica" work by Pablo Picasso at the
entrance of the Security Council of the United Nations has been
covered with a curtain. The reason for covering this work is
that this is the place where diplomats make statements to the
press and have this work as the background. The Picasso work
features the horrors of war. On January 27 a large blue curtain
was placed to cover the work.
Read more here
Tasteless joke of the
week
The Financial Times on Venezuela: "The US, having prematurely recognised
the two-day government that hld power in April, is keeping its
distance - reducing its potentially moderating influence on
events." This would no doubt have got a big belly laugh
in, amongst other places, Mexico (1846), Cuba (1898 to present
day), Nagasaki/Hiroshima (1945), the whole of central America
through the whole of the 20th Century and to date, Chile (1974),
Serbia.....Richard Lapper and Andy-Webb-Vidal get the coveted
Spectre award for bad taste gags. Keep it up, chaps!