1st May 2004
Behind-the-scenes influences exposed in new book on
chemicals policy
Swedish Green
MEP Inger Schörling this week used a Brussels press conference
to launch a revealing new book on the influences which have
gone into the steady watering down of the EU's chemicals policy,
reform of which - in the form of a new system of testing and
control known as REACH - is currently under debate. Alongside
co-author Gunnar Lind, Schörling presented the book entitled
REACH: What happened and why? to journalists in the European
Parliament. Lind is a campaigner on environmental issues and
has worked with ChemSec, the international chemical secretariat
in Sweden.
Speaking at
the press conference Inger Schörling said:
"The EU
has been developing its chemicals policy REACH
to increase the safety of human health and the environment.
It is now time for politicians and industry to accept their
responsibilities and ensure we get legislation that protects
us from the most dangerous chemicals that threaten us in daily
life. The chemicals industry has argued that the implementation
of REACH would be too costly and too great a burden to carry.
That is an argument without basis, as the cost would only be
0.05 per cent of their yearly turnover."
Gunnar Lind
said:
"In the
process of researching this book I have looked through hundreds
of documents dating back a long time and I was surprised to
see that the chemical industry has had such a strong influence
on the framing of the draft REACH legislation. The US chemical
industry in particular has had a major impact and, along with
the Bush administration, it has intervened to successfully sabotage
and delay REACH. By the time the European elections are over
and a new Commission is appointed this Autumn there will only
be about half of all the people left at EU-level who have previously
worked on REACH. So we have written this book for the people
who will make the decisions next year. It is important that
they are well informed about what has happened so far. That
is the purpose of this book and we hope it will be useful."
German Party of Democratic Socialists attacks government
plans for national army: "Aggression rather than defence"
Germany's Party
of Democratic Socialists' (PDS)
has attacked the recently announced proposals to reform
the Bundeswehr (armed forces) as plans to create an "army
of aggression".
The party's
Foreign Policy Spokesman Wolfgang Gehrcke said Before
the Bundestag Defence Minister Peter Struck proclaimed a fundamental
change in the assignment, weaponry and the nature of the Bundeswehr."
It "is no longer to serve national defence; it is meant
to be assigned for world-wide missions," and will become
"an operative army which is seen as an instrument of German
foreign policy." It is clear, Gehrke added, that "the
Bundeswehr is being rearmed and regrouped for foreign operations.
The defence budget is to rise again. Almost half of the troops
are assigned on foreign missions. The mainstay of this army
will be formed by career officers and soldiers. Conscription
is on its last legs. This is not because Germany wants to disarm
itself but because the redefinition of the Bundeswehr characteristics
requires a different type of soldier.
The Bundeswehr
concept of the Schröder government would force Germany increasingly
into world-wide military conflicts, according to Gehrcke. Under
a SPD/Green government the decisive step from a defence army
to an army of aggression has been made. This Bundeswehr reform
violates the Basic Law (German constitution).
The PDS website contains some material translated into
English. Go here
Europe's Great Depression
Laszlo Andor,
progressive Hungarian economist who has written a number of
articles for us in the past, wrote in last week's Guardian that
"East Europeans, who paid a heavy price for the free-market
reforms of the 1990s, now face new burdens because of harsh
EU accession terms." Andor,
author of a number of works on the transition economies, asked
"What is the cause of the sudden hysteria about migrant
workers from east-central Europe among the existing EU states?
Is it that politicians and their advisers have looked at the
income data and suddenly realised the wage gap between east
and west has not narrowed in the last 15 years? Have they only
now realised that the so-called market transition was not a
great success - and concluded that people in the accession states
cannot be anything but desperate to move to countries they have
been unable to catch up with by embracing market forces? If
so, they are about half right." Read his answers here
European Parliamentary elections
imminent
The
European Parliament elections will be held between 10-13 June
2004. In all, 732 members of the European Parliament are to
be elected from the 25 EU Member states. Go here
see the details, country by country.
UK Referendum
UK
Prime Minister Tony Blair faces an uphill struggle to convince
voters to back the EU Constitution in a referendum according
to the latest polls. Read all about it
here
Athens Olympics under the shadow of anti-Muslim racism
The Olympics
in Athens this August will be the first summer games since September
11. Amid the fears about a possible terror attack, it is the
Muslim community of Athens - many of whose members are actually
involved in building the Olympic Village - which is bearing
the brunt of a new form of racism. A budget of $820 million
has been set aside to ensure security at the event. 50,000 police
and troops are ready for deployment and intelligence is being
provided by, among others, Israel, the US and Britain. In March,
US troops participated in a drill to test anti-terrorist operations.
The US has even installed radiation detectors at Greece's borders
to detect smuggled nuclear material. Read all about it here
New campaign launched to protect
food and farming:
GM-FREE EUROPE
Last
week new and much stricter EU labelling legislation governing
genetically modified organisms (GMOs) and foods produced from
them came into force. Realising that we can hardly trust the
authorities to enforce a law which most governments accepted
only because they thought it would allow them to lift the moratorium,
Greenpeace is asking for your help "to find the products
containing GMOs and name & shame them for everyone to see.
The more people that help to reject the products, the easier
it will be to maintain our right to say NO to GMOs." Find
out more here
Meanwhile, Friends of the Earth Europe (FoEE) last week
launched a new campaign to demand better legal protection for
areas wanting to ban genetically modified (GM) crops. Initiatives
to ban GM crops are now running in at least 22 different European
countries.
The
campaign is designed to increase pressure on the European Commission,
which in January admitted that it would "be difficult to
reject these attempts at establishing GM-free zones, which are
driven by strong public local concern and economic considerations
(such as protection of local traditional agriculture)".
Friends
of the Earth Europe have launched a new website - here
- to highlight the different initiatives from regions representing
tens of millions of people who do not want GM Organisms (GMOs)
in food and agriculture.
Actions
taken so far range from regions introducing local laws to ban
cultivation, to public authorities lobbying both Europe and
national Governments for legal protection.
The
number of regions in theEU that want to ban the growing of GM
crops is continuously growing. In France over 1000 town mayors
support GM free zones and in the UK over 44 regions have called
for special protection in their areas. More than 500 cities
in Italy have also taken a position against the use of GMOs
in agriculture.
Commenting
on these developments, Friends of the Earth Europe's GMO Coordinator
Geert Ritsema said "Local people, politicians and businesses
are demanding the right to stay GM free. This is the beginning
of an unstoppable movement that governments and EU institutions
would be stupid to ignore. The public says no to GM foods and
the only way to prevent the contamination of both our crops
and countryside is to ban the cultivation of GM seeds."
New
food labelling laws giving consumers better information about
ingredients originating from GM crops came into force on April
18th.
The
new laws first agreed in July 2003, state that:
-
GM foods must be fully traceable from farm to consumer, and
even foods that no longer contain genetic material derived from
GM crops have to be labelled as GM if they derive from GM crops.
In practice this means that on top of the foods which already
had to be labelled as GM (such as sweet corn) important new
food products (such as vegetable oil and sugars)
now have to be labelled.
-
GM animal feed now have to be labelled and be traceable.
-
Food products with a GM content over 0.9% need to be labelled
as follows: This product contains genetically modified
organisms.
-
Food products with a GM content lower than 0.9% do not need
to be labelled if the food company can prove that the GM contamination
is accidental or technically unavoidable
Dirty Disney don't give a Donald
Duck for children's health
Recent
tests have confirmed the fact that some Disney children's clothes
contain toxic chemicals hazardous to human health and the environment.
And we thought they only poisoned children's minds...A spokesperson
for Greenpeace, which is campaigning to force the mega-corporation
to accept its responsibilities, said "Disney does not think
it should ensure its products are free of toxic chemicals. We
need your help to pressure them to change." Go here
to find out more, and see what you can do to help.
Materials available for US presidential election
For the 2004
US Presidential Election, Syracuse Cultural Workers (a peace
& justice publisher) has produced visually striking, informative
tools - yard signs, buttons, stickers, posters, flags - See
here
The group says
that it is "committed to helping grassroots groups in the
Swing States work on voter education and get out the vote. If
you are a group in a Swing State, we will send you a packet
of free samples such as a poster/flyer "Bush/Cheney's 31
Greatest Accomplishments", the 2004 Peace Calendar "Millions
Say No to War, Yes to Peace", and other goodies.
If you live in one of the states which will decide the outcome
(that's if they use the old-fashioned system, rather than letting
the Republican-dominated Supreme Court decide who wins) you
can request the sample packet by sending your name & postal
address here